I’m puzzled.
Let’s look at just some of the doctors, data analysts and scientists accused of spreading misleading information.
Professor Sucharit Bhakdi taught medical students in bacteriology and immunology. His research features in 314 PubMed-listed publications that he authored or co-authored.
Ryan Cole is a certified anatomic and clinical pathologist with a subspecialty training and particular interest in molecular diagnostics.
Pierre Kory is certified in internal medicine, pulmonary diseases, and critical care medicine. He is former associate professor, chief of critical care service, and medical director of Trauma and Life Support Center at the University of Wisconsin.
Peter Doshi is a senior editor at The British Medical Journal. He is also an associate professor of pharmaceutical health services research at the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy. His research focuses on the drug approval process.
Norman Fenton is a professor in mathematics with experience in critical decision making and in particular, on quantifying uncertainty using causal, probabilistic models that combine data and knowledge. Professor Fenton has expressed his concerns regarding the skewing of COVID19 and vaccine data.
Ed Dowd is a data analyst. He worked on Wall Street most of his career and was a fund manager at BlackRock for ten years. Dowd has authored a book: “Cause Unknown” – The Epidemic of Sudden Deaths in 2021 and 2022, which takes a look at data surrounding deaths associated with the COVID injections.
Aseem Malhotra is an award winning British consultant cardiologist, Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians, and president of the Scientific Advisory Committee – The Public Health Collaboration. He is recognised as an expert in the prevention, diagnosis and management of heart disease. He is calling for a halt to the COVID vaccine rollout.
Robert Malone is a virologist and immunologist who worked on the development of mRNA technology in the 1980s. He has served as an adjunct associate professor of biotechnology at Kennesaw State University. Last year he issued a stark warning: “I am going to speak bluntly, Physicians who speak out are being actively hunted via medical boards and the press. They are trying to delegitimise us and pick us off one by one.”
Peter McCulloch is an award winning internist, cardiologist and epidemiologist. He has more than 1,000 publications and 660 citations in the National Library of Medicine. He warned about excess mortality rates two years ago.
Paul Marik is certified in internal medicine, critical care medicine, neurocritical care and nutrition science. Until recently, he was a tenured professor of medicine. He has written more than 500 peer reviewed journal articles and authored four critical care books. He has received numerous teaching awards, including the National Teacher of the Year award by the American College of Physicians.
Tess Lawrie is a medical doctor and research consultant based in the UK. She is the CEO of Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy. She has worked as an external analyst for the WHO as a guideline methodologist – she assesses evidence, compiles it and makes recommendations.
Vinay Prasad is a haematologist-oncologist and professor in the department of epidemiology and biostatistics at the University of California. He runs the VKPrasad lab, which studies cancer drugs, health policy, clinical trials and better decision making. He has authored more than 350 academic articles.
There are many more such people.
So I’m puzzled why people, so eminent in their fields, have been ignored. Not only ignored, they have been accused of heinous acts of misinformation, they have been stonewalled, belittled and patronised.
If you search them up in Wikipedia, you’ll get a picture of how they are vilified and cancelled, thinly based on narrative assumptions.
Why would health authorities not listen to what they have to say, especially now that their warnings are materialising?
There’s less than nothing in it for those who have dared take on the establishment.
Robert Malone says: “For us, as for the vaccine damaged and dead, there is no solace and no forgiveness. No apologies anticipated nor provided.”
But, spite of the damage to reputation, Tess Lawrie exhorts more doctors to speak out:
“Now that you know the Covid-19 vaccines are not safe and effective, that they are not the same as traditional vaccines, that there are unprecedented numbers of adverse drug reactions reported to the official databases, and that COVID ‘boosters’ are systematically destroying people’s immunity not ‘boosting’ it, please stand up for the truth, uphold your Hippocratic Oath, and do what is right. It is a strength not a weakness to be able to change one’s mind when new information comes to light.”
Time has yet to tell who is on the right side of history but there is a growing number of people who are sceptical about the official narrative and government policies,
Indeed emerging data suggests that the window is closing for health authorities, politicians and academics to claim: “We didn’t know, we were just following orders”.
Perhaps we need a Truth and Reconciliation Commission, like that established in South Africa as apartheid crumbled.
This was a court-like body established by the new South African government in 1995 to help heal the country and bring about a reconciliation of its people by uncovering the truth about human rights violations that had occurred during the period of apartheid.
Its emphasis was on gathering evidence and uncovering information—from both victims and perpetrators—and not on prosecuting individuals for past crimes, which is how the commission mainly differed from the Nürnberg trials that prosecuted Nazis after World War II.
An important feature of the commission was its openness and transparency.
New Zealand’s brand new Prime Minister Chris Hipkins may welcome such a move as he tries to win the hearts of many bruised citizens, before the 2023 New Zealand general election, set for October 14.
It was he who drove Jacinda Ardern’s COVID pandemic response campaign that earned her the label of tyrant.
Hipkins hints at a fresh look at Labour Party policies, taking into account changed circumstances. Though he doesn’t specify which policies he will target. It is possible he is looking at fresh data about the safety and efficacy of the mRNA vaccinations that he once pushed so hard under Ardern’s direction.
As he took office, he said in an interview: "I've dealt with some challenging situations over the last five and a half years, the last couple of years particularly, And, you know, I'm a human being. I'll make the odd mistake from time to time. I try to own the mistakes that I make."
Which policies, which mistakes?
*************************************************************************************************************
Sources
Various Experts Have Been Warning The World
Universities still won't debate COVID policy
Truth and Reconciliation Commission
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Truth-and-Reconciliation-Commission-South-Africa
Professor Norman Fenton Questions Vaccine Data analysis
Professor Norman Fenton questions vaccine data analysis | UKColumn
Flawed statistics
https://www.normanfenton.com/
Chris Hipkins Faces a Tough Road as New Zealand PM
Troubleshooter Chris Hipkins Faces a Tough Road as New Zealand PM
Tipping point for the narrative
A tipping in the COVID vaccines narrative? COVID crimes – Part 3
Peter Doshi
Serious Adverse Events of Special Interest Following mRNA Vaccination in Randomized Trials
Debate and discussion are essential for science
Tess Lawrie
=post
Alex Berenson
Excess mortality
Robert Malone
Ed Dowd